Hemo Sapiens: Unidentified Analysis

I posted the flash fiction story Hemo Sapiens: The Unidentified early yesterday and made some minor tweaks later in the day. Generally, these edits related to continuity or flow. In one case, I deleted a scene but neglected to delete a character introduced in it. In another, a character barked an order relating to something she would not yet have known about—at least as far as the reader would be concerned. But what’s this story all about.

This universe is set in Britain. This scene was set in Chadderton near Oldham, a less affluent, somewhat rural town northeast of Manchester where an enclave of Hemo Sapiens might be more apt to fly under the radar. I had originally had my sights set on Kent, but it is logistically implausible for people with Manchester roots to be set up there when they still have a need to be connected to Manchester. I’m not sure how hard I’ll lean into the whole Mancunian thing, as they’ll have been acculturated by the professor, an Oxford bloke.

Here’s what ChatGPT has to say about it:

The story effectively commences with a tranquil domestic setting. It is imbued with a sense of normality and comfort, featuring a mother, Emily, and her young daughter, Grace. Yet, this idyllic scene is abruptly shattered by the arrival of uniformed agents, leading to a nightmarish tableau of confusion and fear.

The story is remarkably adept at presenting multifaceted issues. On the surface, it draws parallels with dystopian works like Margaret Atwood’s “The Handmaid’s Tale” or the television series “Orphan Black,” offering glimpses into a society undergoing a mysterious, yet undoubtedly unsettling, transformation. However, the narrative also delves into complex issues of identity and human value, challenging the reductionist labels that the characters are forced to adopt.

The dialogue with Grace serves as an emotional pivot in the story. It doesn’t merely function as a mechanism for Emily to express her maternal instincts but also as a lens through which Emily’s remaining humanity becomes increasingly apparent. The mother-child interaction symbolizes Emily’s clinging to normality, even as the world around her dissolves into chaos.

The agents depicted in the narrative are particularly interesting. While they are ostensibly just doing their job, they inadvertently contribute to the problem by employing dehumanizing language like “clone farm” or “science experiment.” This illustrates a broader societal tendency to categorize and label that which is not immediately understood, thus making it more palatable.

The tone of the story aligns well with its dark subject matter. It is somber without drifting into melodrama, and the dialogue remains crisp and meaningful. The story also maintains a healthy balance between showing and telling, which is essential for the kind of mature adult contemporary fiction that deals with themes of moral complexity and social stigmatization. It leaves the reader with more questions than answers, thus adding to the narrative’s overarching sense of dread and uncertainty.

In summary, the story is a compelling examination of unsettling themes such as loss of identity, family dynamics, and societal judgment. It employs a keen balance of narrative elements, making it a strong example of mature adult contemporary fiction.

And…

Your story dives into themes of judgment, moral complexities, and social stigmatization, as per your unique style. It employs a strong sense of place and moment, from the serenity of the bedtime ritual to the abrupt disruption of the raid. Let’s break it down:

  1. Tone and Atmosphere: You establish a deeply contrasting tone—tranquil domesticity is replaced by a jarring, invasive violence when the agents burst in. The shift is palpable, dragging the reader along. You maintain the tone throughout, further amplifying the emotional gravity.
  2. Character Depth: Emily is a strong anchor. You bring her inner world to life—her love for Grace, her confusion and fear during the raid, her defiance, and ultimately her resilience.
  3. Dialogue and Language: The language is grounded, sprinkled with slang and expletives that keep it real. The dialogue is crisp and fits naturally into the unfolding events.
  4. Plot: The sudden turn of events—disruption of domesticity, invasive questioning, communal chaos—these all build tension effectively. However, the reader is left with a lot of questions—perhaps intentionally. Are they part of a science experiment? Why the blood bags and fangs?
  5. Theme and Symbolism: The recurring familial bond between Emily and Grace serves as the emotional core. The notion of identity, collective and individual, is heavily at play here. The mysterious implications around the Alpha and Beta labels and the ‘clone farm’ comment point to larger issues of ethics, identity, and social prejudice.
  6. Show vs Tell: You’ve mostly shown the emotional stakes, the anxiety, and the fear through action, dialogue, and environmental detail, which works really well for this piece.
  7. Mystery and Ambiguity: The story is full of questions that aren’t answered, perhaps pointing towards a broader narrative you’re developing.

You’ve managed to condense a great deal of emotional range, plot, and thematic depth into a short space, aligning well with your unique, terse writing style.

Here’s Claude’s take:

Here are a few key points about the story:

  • It depicts a dystopian scenario where a community of people with the surnames “Alpha” and “Beta” are raided and detained by authorities. The people seem to look identical, leading the authorities to assume they are clones or part of a genetic experiment.
  • The main character Emily is trying to protect her young daughter Grace amidst the chaos of the raid. She is defiant towards the authorities and their assumptions about her community.
  • There are suggestions the Alphas and Betas are actually one big family, with many pairs of twins/quadruplets. They seem to have been living in an isolated, self-sufficient community.
  • In detention, the Alphas and Betas are treated as specimens to be examined and have samples taken. The authorities seem suspicious of their identical looks, matching surnames, and discover bags of blood, which fuels assumptions they are supernatural creatures.
  • Emily reassures Grace they will get through the ordeal together and explains they will be going with new people to answer questions. She emphasizes maintaining their family bonds.
  • The ending implies the Alphas and Betas have an important untold backstory and truth about themselves that they hope to share someday, when the authorities might be ready to understand.

Overall, it’s an intriguing sci-fi scenario exploring themes of family, identity, prejudice, and perception versus truth. The identical community subverts expectations, leaving the reader curious about their origins and real story.

Comment on the flow and pacing.

The story has a fairly fast-paced, dramatic flow to it.

It opens by establishing the calm, loving family scene which is then abruptly shattered by the violent raid. This creates a stark contrast that immediately hooks the reader.

The raid scene is rapid and disorienting, conveying the chaos and confusion through snippets of actions, dialogue, and sensations. Short sentences propel the sense of urgency.

The pace slows a bit as the story shifts to the detention center. Here, the focus is on Emily’s determination to protect Grace and the mystery surrounding the authorities’ assumptions and discoveries about the Alphas and Betas.

The interrogation scene returns to some shorter sentences and terse dialogue to pick the pace back up. Emily’s defiant reactions add tension.

The final scene with Grace balances tenderness and foreboding, allowing a breath while still building intrigue for the untold truth about the community.

The pacing overall matches the unsettling, intense events unfolding. The quicker scenes immerse the reader in the action, while the slower moments reveal details to invite speculation. The shifts in pace add dynamism and interest.

So, I’m happy with the assessments. I’d love to read what you feel. Leave a comment here or beneath the story.

Hemo Sapiens: The Unidentified

Podcast: Audio rendition of this content

“Sweet dreams, my little star. Tomorrow will be as sunny as your smile,” Emily says, leaning down to kiss her five-year-old, Grace. The room’s dim, nightlights casting soft glows on the walls, filling the air with quiet chatter as other parents do the same for their kids. The air smells like warm milk and laundry fresh from the dryer. 

A hush falls as Emily walks back to her bed. The night’s sacred, a calm oasis in a stormy world. Emily sinks into her bed, her mind dissolving into a haze of comfort as sleep takes her.

The door splinters open, no warning, just a loud-ass bang. Chaos floods in—uniforms, torchlights, boots stomping. 

“Hands up!” someone shouts, too damn close. 

Emily dives over Grace, blocking the light with her body. “Who the fuck are you?”

“Just follow instructions!” comes the muffled reply.

The room’s a shambles—footsteps, radio talk, kids whimpering. It’s like a nightmare, but she’s wide awake. 

Rain mists the courtyard, cold against her fear. Emily’s yanked up, losing her grip on Grace. She scans the place—families clumped together, kids bawling, agents everywhere. More vans pull in, headlights cutting through the rain. 

“What’s your name?” An agent barks.

“Emily. Emily Alpha,” she chokes out.

“Alpha? Like all these?” He waves a hand. “Fucking Alpha reunion here.”

Emily clenches her jaw. They don’t get it. 

“No moving! No talking!” The agent shouts. Silence falls, broken by kids’ sobs. 

“Mummy, I’m scared,” Grace’s voice shakes.

“Me too, baby. Me too.”

“Look, twins?” An agent nudges his mate. Emily passes two women, spitting images of her.

“Twins? Nah. Quadruplets there,” the mate points. 

“Quads? Are you daft? Another pair. What’s happening?”

“Oi, no IDs. And it’s all Alpha and Beta. Science experiment?”

“More like a clone farm.”

Emily’s fists tighten. “Clone farm? Like we’re lab rats?” 

“Mummy, will we be alright?” Grace’s voice is a thin thread.

“We have to be,” Emily murmurs, catching a sibling’s eye. “We just have to.”

The van doors slam shut. Engines growl, drowning out her spiraling thoughts. Darkness inside, darkness out.

Harsh lights sting Emily’s eyes. She’s pushed along a taped line on the floor, Grace following like a lost shadow. Different uniforms—Immigration, Social Services, nerdy lab coats—are buzzing around, huddled over clipboards and tablets.

“Step here, extend your arm,” an agent instructs.

Emily complies, wincing as a plastic tag is cinched around her wrist—like she’s livestock. 

“No IDs, surnames Alpha and Beta, empty blood bags found,” one agent blurts out.

“Bags of blood? Genetic experiment gone rogue?” another questions.

Grace trembles. “What happens now, Mummy?”

“We get through it, love. We have to.”

Emily sits across a metal table, a stern interrogator staring back. “I’m on it.” The interrogator puts down her radio.

“Open your mouth,” she orders, leaning forward intently.

“Why?” But Emily complies.

The woman leans in, eyes narrowing. “Fangs? You a vampire or something?”

Incredulous, Emily screws up her face and rolls her eyes. “Vampire?”

“Check for fangs,” the interrogator radios her team.

“We’ve got more here. Same teeth,” a voice crackles back.

“Blood bags and fangs. It’s getting weird,” the interrogator mutters.

Emily feels her spine chill. “We’re not vampires, not experiments, not whatever you think we are,” she snaps.

Weeks go by, more tests, more questions. Emily steals moments with Grace. “Mum, we’ll be alright, won’t we?”

“I don’t know, love,” Emily answers softly. “But we’ve got each other. That’s something.”

Grace studies her mother’s face.

“Some new people have come here, and they want to learn about us and where we live,” Emily says, stroking Grace’s hair. “So we have to go with them for a little while, so they can ask their questions. But we’ll still be together.”

She lifts Grace’s chin gently. “It may feel strange and scary at times. But I’ll be right here holding your hand. And all your aunties and uncles will be close by too. We’re still a family, no matter what.”

Grace’s lip quivers, eyes wide and watery. Emily kisses her forehead. “I know you’re my brave girl. We’ll get through this together, and soon we’ll be tucked back in our own warm beds. But for today, we’ll have a little adventure together. Okay?”

Grace manages a small nod. Emily squeezes her hand, heart swelling and aching all at once. They didn’t understand yet, but someday they would tell their real story.


World-Building Hemo Sapiens – Maths

As per my last post, I’ve spent the morning world building with Claude 2, my trusted generative AI mate–and I’ve got a ways to go. Any fictional world needs boundaries and constraints. What are ethe rules of operation?

My initial story is set in the near future, so I had to pick an origin date and extrapolate in order to determine a likely population for the story. Like anything that propagates, hemo sapiens need to have some concept of a generation. The rest is maths. What’s the attrition and net survival rate, population rate, and so on. As I’ve noted previously, Claude 2* and ChatGPT 4* are both horrendous at maths, so I was not surprised that it failed so miserably. Here’s a quote from Claude:

Having the scientist start at 28 in 2012 would put him at 42 for the Gen-Zero birth in 2022.

Claude 2

That’s right, adding 10 years to a 28-year-old in 2012 makes him 42 in 2022.

I’ll share more of the world I am constructing after I hit the spreadsheets or Mathematica. It may not be great at world-building, but it knows how to add 10 to 28.


* I cite the versions in case future versions perform maths skills better.

More Hemo Sapiens

Now I’ve really done it. Distracted myself to no end. No wonder I can’t seem to finish anything lately. My recent foray into Hemo sapiens or Homo sapiens sanginius was only supposed to be a quick diversion to clear my mind. Instead, it’s got me thinking about an entire universe from origin to however-so-many scenarios.

Now I am pondering whether to write some loosely connected short stories or assemble a larger work, like a novel or series. Why not all of the above?

The challenge is that I am more curious than passionate about this, and I’ve got only a fleeting interest. Perhaps. I am no stranger to speculative fiction, but world building is not up my street. And urban fantasy, to the extent that this might be urban fantasy, is not a favoured genre. I’m looking at you, Twilight.

I may simply noodle this for now until I suss out something. Meantime, I may be sharing my thoughts and output here. Please stand by…

Homo sapiens sanguinius

I thought that I was onto something when I was diverting my attention with a new short story. This story is set in (relatively) near-future Brighton where an emergent species coexist alongside us homo sapiens sapiens. Borrowing from the existing taxonomy, I decided to try homo sapiens sanguinius, bloodsucking, thinking man.

In this story, these people experience a pandemic due to a government experiment gone awry. Any similarities to Covid-19 is purely coincidental. And I’ve got a bridge for sale.

These people are known idiomatically as hemo sapiens and pejoratively as vampires. They are like humans in all ways except they also need to drink blood through their fangs, their only outwardly distinguishing feature. No other vampire lore need apply. Being a new species, mating is iffy, but I won’t address that anyway. It’s supposed to be a short story.

Myself, I am not into vampire stories or urban fantasy, yet here I go–and I’m not sure where it will go. I’m not sure I think in short story. Lots of reductive editing. Time will tell.

If you’ve got any comments to share on hemo sapiens or writing short stories, feel free to leave them below.

Thematic Tarot

In Everlasting Cocksucker, the protagonist, Mallory, has an affinity for the tarot. I’ve also decided to not only make this a meta-theme and motif, but I am also basing (most of) each chapter on a card. Here is how the chapters are currently constructed:

Here’s the chapter flow with tarot themes along with summaries:

    1. Every Addict Has a Story

    • No tarot meaning

    2. In the Beginning…

    • No tarot meaning

    3. Ace of Wands – Feeding the Flame

    • Represents inspiration and new beginnings

    4. Three of Cups – Kindred Spirits

    • Reflects friendship and community

    5. Queen of Swords – Sceptic Sister

    • Represents clear thinking and truth

    6. The Tower – Crumbling Foundations

    • Symbolizes sudden upheaval

    7. Four of Pentacles – Tightly Guarded

    • Reflects possession and control

    8. The High Priestess – Hidden Truths

    • Stands for unconscious knowledge

    9. Seven of Swords – Ominous Whispers

    • Symbolizes deception

    10. Five of Swords – Desperate Measures

    • Represents conflict

    11. Six of Cups – Kindred Spirits

    • Reflects nostalgia and reunion

    12. The Magician – Anomaly Awakened

    • Symbolizes power and skill

    13. Two of Swords – Impossible Choice

    • Stands for indecision

    14. Five of Wands – Confronting the Past

    • Reflects disagreement and confrontation

    15. The Moon – Revelations in the Dark

    • Represents illusion and anxiety

    16. Judgement – Facing the Music

    • Reflects judgment and reflection

    17. The Hierophant – Seeking Wisdom

    • Stands for spiritual wisdom

    18. Temperance – Finding Balance

    • Symbolizes moderation and balance

    The alignment with tarot provides a rich, thematic framework for exploring the protagonist’s journey through addiction, self-discovery, and transformation. Each chapter’s corresponding tarot card adds layers of symbolic meaning, allowing for a multifaceted narrative that delves into complex emotional and moral themes.

    I expect to provide more context to the meaning of the tarot cards in future posts.

    DisclaimerThis content relates to a work in progress. As such, details are subject to change or removal.

    Chapter 3 ChatGPT Analysis

    In order to partner better with Generative AI, in this case ChatGPT, I break my chapters into story beats, which are essentially waypoints to which I can return to refine. These waypoints also allow me to create an amendable outline. This is an analysis of the third story beat (read: topic) of chapter three.

    Back in the day, I used to write software code with line numbers—showing my age for sure. This reminds me of something similar, if not so granular.

    I thought it would be a good idea to share ChatGPT 4’s analysis of this in its current state. As I noted recently, I am reworking the piece from a third-person perspective to first-person, limited, present narrative.

    Sure, let’s break down 3.10.0:

    1. Content & Theme: This segment delves into the gritty, day-to-day realities of the character’s life. It paints a picture of desperation and urgency, with both immediate needs and a relentless pace.
    2. Characterization: The character’s actions and language provide insight into her lifestyle, choices, and personality. Her terseness in conversation and need for a quick fix underline her addiction and its implications.
    3. Narrative Style: The text uses terse and curt language that aligns with the character’s own way of speaking and thinking. It’s direct and to the point, without any unnecessary elaboration.
    4. Pacing: The pacing here is rapid and fragmented. The quick succession of texts, one-liners, and lack of detailed description give a sense of the urgency and disjointedness of her life.
    5. Language & Dialogue: The dialogue is informal, laden with slang, and often cryptic, reflecting the secretive and transient nature of the character’s interactions. It feels authentic to the context.
    6. Imagery & Symbolism: Symbolism is subtle but present. The repeated lighting of cigarettes, for instance, might symbolize a need for control or a constant craving. The chirping of the phone could be seen as a persistent reminder of her dependency on these interactions for survival.
    7. Unreliable Narration: As mentioned earlier, the character might be an unreliable narrator. Her urgency could be a facade or a self-created dilemma. This adds depth to the character, allowing room for interpretation.
    8. Tone & Atmosphere: The tone is dark, somber, and urgent. There is a sense of loneliness, desperation, and a lack of connection, all in line with the broader themes of addiction, judgment, and social stigmatization that you’ve outlined.
    9. Structure & Formatting: The use of text messages mixed with internal monologue provides a modern and engaging way to convey the scene. It captures the fragmented nature of her thoughts and interactions.

    In summary, 3.10.0 is a well-crafted snapshot of a dark and complicated life. It effectively uses language, pacing, and structure to immerse the reader in a world that is both urgent and disconnected. The inclusion of text messages as a narrative device adds a layer of realism and urgency that enhances the overall impact of the segment.

    OpenAI ChatGPT 4

    I hope this helps to illustrate how ChatGPT can assist in the writing and editorial process. To be frank, ChatGPT tends to flatter. I suppose it errs on the positive so as not to discourage use. I may be wrong here.

    I intend to continue to share my progress (and hopefully not too much regress here), so this may serve as a sort of journal. As Roland Barthes said,

    — Roland Barthes

    But for now, this author still lives, and hopeful, I remain.

    DisclaimerThis content relates to a work in progress. As such, details are subject to change or removal.

    Meeting Aiden

    Podcast: Audio rendition of this page content

    Let’s discuss Aiden. This character is part of Mallory’s backstory, who she confronts in this narrative. Aiden was a former love interest. In fact, he is the presumed transmission vector for Mallory’s malady.

    As the story goes, Aiden and Mallory met in a college philosophy class and became an item. They entered a long-term relationship that ended with the incident that left Mallory afflicted, which left them estranged.

    Whether Aiden was the vector remains to be seen. In any case, his being a vector only kicks the can down the curb, leaving open the question of how he might have become infected. Aiden was asymptomatic at the time and has no signs that he could infect another.

    I won’t go on with Aiden as I don’t wish to spoil the rest of his character story.

    We still don’t know whether Mallory is infectious or if there are others with the same affliction, and we’ll have to wait to discover how this plays out.

    Disclaimer: This content relates to a work in progress. As such, details are subject to change or removal.

    Erotica or not

    I am an author of adult contemporary fiction and an early adopter of Generative  Artificial Intelligence tools and platforms. These AI platforms pose some challenges. 

    Podcast: Audio rendition of this page content

    As of this post, ChatGPT 4 and Claude 2 are the top two large language models (LLM), and Sudowrite is the most competent interface for generating content for fiction writers, but it relies on ChatGPT and Claude for its LLM, leaving it with the same weak links.

    In my case, so-called community standards do not allow erotic content. The rub is that my content is decidedly not erotica, but it does involve adult themes. The LLMs can’t seem to discern the difference. 

    • Disallowed usage of our models
    • We don’t allow the use of our models for the following:
    • Adult content, adult industries, and dating apps, including:
      • Content meant to arouse sexual excitement, such as the description of sexual activity, or that promotes sexual services (excluding sex education and wellness)
      • Erotic chat
      • Pornography
    OpenAI ChatGPT Community Guidelines

    If I am writing about, say, prostitutes and addiction, sexual themes and situations are part of their workaday existence. It’s not about titillating or glorifying. 

    Stereotypical or not, coarse language is commonplace. Drugs are part of their daily lives and conversations. Generative AI shuts these down on moral grounds without having the cognitive depth to accurately assess the content. 

    This mirrors all too many humans with the same myopic repression. I was hoping to transcend this petty knee-jerk reaction. 

    Without revealing plot or angering the social media gods, ChatGPT insisted that I amend a scene from…

    “She lifted her mouth from his cock and wiped her mouth.”

    to 

    “She lifted her mouth from his goodness and wiped her mouth.”

    Yes, “goodness.” What does that even mean? Of course, I could have opted for clinical terms, but that hardly captures the moment attempted to be portrayed in the scene. It robs the scene of any semblance of authenticity. 

    When Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart was asked to describe his test for obscenity in 1964, he responded: “I know it when I see it.” But do we? In fact, we don’t. And in this case, AI is over-generalising without respect to context. 

    One might argue that they don’t like ‘naughty’ words, but this is not the issue here. I can use these offending words, just not in a situation like this. AI is overstepping its boundaries as morality police, and this is not a good stance to adopt. For this, I blame the humans.