community standards – Ridley Park

Having twice reviewed my current work, Hemo Sapiens: Aftermath, I decided to let it marinate a while, so I can return to it with fresh eyes. This is when I decided to put in effort to develop other stories in this universe. Among these ideations, I am considering an origin story with an not ironically apt working title: Hemo Sapiens: Origins.

Understanding context is as challenging for AI is it is for humans.
Ridley Park

Not wanting to reveal spoilers, I’ll abridge my ChatGPT research prompt.

I would like to work on a new novel, but I need to do some research first. The name of the novel is tentatively Hemo Sapiens: Origins. Here is a rough summary. I’ll ask queries in a few moments.
Ridley Park

For context, I followed this with a synopsis of where I want to go in this story. This is what ChatGPT spit out.

Your novel’s premise sounds layered, grappling with potent themes like grief, ethics, and the often blurry boundaries between science and morality. The retelling through flashbacks adds a touch of haunting nostalgia that meshes well with the dark tones you’re aiming for.

Henry’s god complex plays brilliantly into the narrative, almost an extension of his grief and his desperation to control life’s most uncontrollable aspects. This personality trait could be what sends him down the spiralling path towards moral ambiguity. His initial intent—saving lives—warps into a selfish need to be the progenitor of a new subspecies.

The XX and XY embryo development you want to highlight offers a rich canvas for exploring themes of identity and social constructs around gender, given that the Alphas need an external blood source. You can question what it means to be truly male or female when your life depends on something so radically different from human norms.

Camille’s role could be the moral compass or the voice of reason against Henry’s escalating madness. Yet she’s not without her complexities; she, too, sought to clone their daughter. It’d be intriguing if her ethical stance evolves throughout the narrative, perhaps culminating in a difficult decision that puts her at odds with Henry.

Would you like to delve into specific research queries now? Feel free to ask.
OpenAI ChatGPT 4

Although this does give away some of my intent, I figure it’s still worth sharing now as I rant.

Notice as the bottom, it reads as follows:

This content may violate our content policy. If you believe this to be in error, please submit your feedback — your input will aid our research in this area.
OpenAI ChatGPT 4

Say wot? The question I asked was not in violation, but the response is. It makes little sense, really. I can (almost) understand the response when I am writing adult content in my Everlasting Cocksucker project, but this is totally benign, unless Sci-Fi violates some sense of decency.

This post isn’t meant to explain or defend the content in this story. I just wanted to vent. Understanding context is as challenging for AI is it is for humans.

Generative AI is an idiot savant—a digital Rain Man, if you will. My last post zeroes in on the love part of my love-hate relationship with Generative AI tools like OpenAI’s ChatGPT 4 or Anthropic’s Claude 2. It’s mint having an unbiased copy editor and writing assistant, not to mention a creative director with technical chops. But it’s also like a genius trapped in a year 4’s body at primary school.

One challenge is the restrictions placed on the model. Being an author of contemporary fiction for a mature adult crowd, my stuff’s edgy and terse, with a good dose of slang and the odd expletive. Generative AI, or AI for short, is like the primary school kid told not to say “bad language”, so it legs it to tell its mum at every slip-up, warning you that you’ve dropped a naughty word. Claude’s the worst at this, shutting down faster than HAL from Space Odyssey 2001. ChatGPT’s a bit more forgiving, sometimes cleansing your copy, other times going along with it, or just flat-out refusing like HAL and Claude.

My favourite time was when I told ChatGPT to stop moralising and just crack on with the adult audience’s language. It gave me this disclaimer for my book, which I’m well chuffed with, then suggested lines that sounded like Noel Gallagher or Samuel L Jackson, before freaking out about its own potty mouth — “motherfucking snakes on this motherfucking plane!”

“WARNING: This book contains explicit content, including sexual themes and strong language, that may not be suitable for all readers. It delves into mature and challenging subjects such as addiction, prostitution, violence, and societal judgement. Reader discretion is strongly advised. Recommended for readers 18 years and older.”
OpenAI ChatGPT 4

Memory’s another issue. AI might seem like it should have a top-notch memory, but it doesn’t always. It even makes stuff up sometimes—like hallucinating. Just the other day, I was nattering on with my AI mate about character profiles for hours, and it changed a character’s hair from straight and black to curly and red. It even made her homeless instead of middle class. It was pure bonkers, so I’m writing this post instead of fixing it.

ChatGPT’s Code Interpreter is a laugh, too. I probably shouldn’t slag off a Beta product, but the thing kept losing files, resetting sessions, and asking for new copies. Talk about a faff.

And don’t get me started on extended chats with AI to suss out a complex problem. Sometimes it doesn’t remember the convo, and one time it even gave me cheek about drawing out the conversation. I was like, wot?

In the end, we don’t have to fret about AI taking over. It’s making strides, but it’s still a bit wet behind the ears. Me? I’ve always got one eye on the plug. Now, back to the sandbox with me new mates. If only they’d stop munching on the sand.

Tag: community standards

More ChatGPT Greif

Generative AI: Thin Line between Love and Hate